PowerFill Phase 6b — Multi-Pass Allocation Engine
Date: 2026-04-18 (afternoon / evening)
Agent: Systems Architect (with PO checkpoint mid-flight; Collaborator independent NVO-citation verification at the checkpoint pause)
Scope: Verbatim port of psp_powerfill_conset (NVO 50-5886, ~5,837 source lines — the largest single legacy procedure in PowerFill) into 008_CreateAllocationProcedure.sql; integration as Step 4 of PowerFillRunService; 4 new RunService unit tests; A1 revision (3 stages per constraint, contradicting Phase 0's "four discrete passes"); A9 resolution (cblock = constraint capacity block, conset-internal); 6 new assumptions A46-A51; spec amendment to reflect the empirical multi-stage structure. First economically-realistic allocation output PSSaaS has produced against real customer data: 515 allocations on PS_DemoData in ~30 seconds.
This entry continues the pre-6b sweep arc. Read that first for the legacy-plugin-migrations context that 6b inherits as clean ground.
Why this entry exists
The Phase 6 sub-phase breakdown estimated 6b at 7-10 days as the largest single sub-phase. The actual elapsed time was ~1 day, helped by: (a) the empirical NVO trace was unexpectedly clear (the legacy author left 12 named CHECK POINT diagnostic markers + 4 stage labels as scaffolding); (b) the Reviewable Chunks PO-checkpoint pattern compressed scope by surfacing decisions early; (c) the 6a infrastructure (PowerFillRunService, typed-parameter EXEC pattern, test fixture) was directly reusable; (d) the subagent SQL transcription succeeded cleanly first attempt; (e) the discovered findings had clear fixes that didn't expand scope. The arc generated material at risk of staying in commit messages; this entry persists it.
Timeline (compressed)
- Session-start checklist — re-read priority docs (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, architect-context, process-discipline, handoff-prompts, breakdown, open-questions, 6a completion, pre-6b sweep completion, syn-trades deep dive, A44+); verified environment (sentinel green, baseline
POST /runComplete in 1.66s, WSL+jq+sqlcmd available, working tree clean post-pre-6b-sweep push). - Empirical NVO trace — verified function boundaries via
Grep ^public function|^end function. Discovered F-6b-1: the kickoff's "pass boundaries scatter through NVO 7500-12500" was wrong — that range ispsp_powerfill_pool_guide(6c). Conset is strictly NVO 50-5886. (Third Phase-0 Truth Rot finding in a Phase 6 reference doc.) - Multi-pass structure trace —
Grepfor control flow + comment markers (WHILE,BEGIN Loop,END OF STAGE,SWEEP BACK THROUGH ORPHANS,Constraint Super Loop Begins). Discovered F-6b-2: A1's "four discrete passes" labels do NOT appear anywhere in the NVO. Empirical structure: outerWHILE @xc<=@xcPopconstraint loop × per-constraint (Setup + Stage 1 + Stage 2 ≤20 iterations + Orphan Sweep). Three stages per constraint, not four passes. - A9 probe (
pfill_cblock_guide/pfill_trade_cblock_basepopulator) —Grepshowed both tables are DELETEd at NVO 101-102 (start of conset), LEFT-JOINed as eligibility filters at 13 sites across all 3 stages, and INSERTed at NVO 5718 / 5741 (near end of conset). 6b owns these tables internally. A9 RESOLVED: cblock = "constraint capacity block." - Alternatives-First Gate — three options for the conset port: (A) monolithic verbatim per ADR-021, (B) decomposition into named procs, (C) C# orchestration of T-SQL slices. B and C break the proc's
@table_varlifetimes and risk parity bugs Phase 9 would surface. A chosen. - R-DATA-1 disposition — Architect default option 2 (reconfigure 1 PS_DemoData constraint to target
15 fhlmc cashthat has trades). Documented in plan §3.4 with 3 options evaluated. - Plan authored at
.cursor/plans/powerfill-phase-6b.plan.md(gitignored, 12-section template per Phase 5/6a precedent). - PO checkpoint — Architect Report dispatched summarizing findings, decisions, R-DATA-1 disposition. Reviewable Chunks at sub-phase scope — the first time PowerFill stopped at a sub-phase plan checkpoint specifically to confirm Architect-default before the largest single delegation. PO acknowledged D1 + D2 + F-6b-1 (3-session-corroborated Truth Rot pattern advances candidate refinement to v3.1 nomination); Collaborator independently re-verified all 4 NVO citations during the pause.
- PO approval received, execution unblocked.
- SQL transcription delegated — fast subagent per Template 2 (modeled on Phase 6a 006 transcription protocol, scaled 8.7x). Subagent built a one-shot Node.js helper to walk NVO lines 51-5883, applied mechanical regex unwraps, produced 5,919-line
008_CreateAllocationProcedure.sql. All 11 structural anchors verified by subagent + spot-checked by Architect at 4 sampled regions. +31 consistent NVO offset throughout. 0~""PB-escape sequences (matches pre-flight verification). - Deploy to local pssaas-db — failed CREATE with 16
Msg 207"Invalid column name" errors (pscat_trades.rm_trade_type,loan.orig_loan_amount, etc.). New finding F-6b-8 / A49:WITH ENCRYPTIONproc CREATE doesn't get deferred-name-resolution help when a referenced column is missing on an existing table (only when the table itself is missing). Documented as expected behavior; local pssaas-db is a narrow projection of full Desktop App schema. - Deploy to PS_DemoData — clean. Single PRINT line, idempotent re-deploy works.
- C# extension — added
StepAllocationconstant +RunAllocationStepAsyncmethod toPowerFillRunService(~80 LOC); 3 new fields toRunSummary(AllocatedCount,KickedOutCount,CblockCount); 6-parameter EXEC mapping (RunScope/CarryPriceMode → legacy 'cl'/'co'/'pc'/'po' codes); 10-min command timeout for the EXEC; post-EXEC counter queries against the 3 output tables. - Sentinel bumped to
phase-6b-multi-pass-ready. Build clean (0 warnings, 0 errors). - First PoC attempt —
POST /runagainst PS_DemoData. Allocation step timed out at 32s (SqlClient default 30s timeout). Fixed: 10-minSetCommandTimeout()wrapping the EXEC. - Second PoC attempt — Allocation step now finishes but fails with
SqlException 1934: SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER. Tried fixing on C# side (prefixing the EXEC SQL withSET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON); didn't help. New finding F-6b-7 / A50:WITH ENCRYPTIONprocs capture SET options at CREATE time, ignoring caller session SET state. Fix is at proc deploy time, not EXEC time. - Third PoC attempt (after redeploy with SET preamble) —
status: Completein 29.7s. 515 real allocations. All 4 steps Succeeded. MILESTONE. - Sample allocation output verified — real loan IDs, real trade IDs, realistic loan amounts ($200K-$580K), realistic
prx_and_carryvalues (95-103). Allocation engine is producing economically realistic output against real customer data. - R-DATA-1 self-resolved — the planned constraint reconfigure was not needed. The conset proc populates
pfill_trade_basefor the small-balance instruments as part of its own Setup phase (because conset has its own internal candidate-build logic — A51 observation). PS_DemoData works as-shipped. - 4 new RunService unit tests added —
StepNames_AreFourInExpectedOrder,Run_AllocationStepNotReached_WhenCandidateBuilderFails,RunSummary_AllocationFields_DefaultToZero,RunSummary_AllocationFields_SerializeAsSnakeCase. Self-implemented per Deliberate Non-Delegation (small surface, easier to add to existing file than spawn subagent). - Final test sweep — 147 passed, 6 skipped, 0 failed (was 143/6/0 — added 4 new tests; no regressions).
- Spec amendment to
powerfill-engine.md— replaced "Multi-pass allocation: exact_fit / best_fit / fill_remaining / orphan_handling" with "Multi-stage allocation: Setup / Stage 1 / Stage 2 / Orphan Sweep" per A1 revision. Updated pseudo-code block. Marked 3 spec "Open Items" RESOLVED. - Assumption log updated — A1 revised; A1.0 marked RESOLVED; A46-A51 added; A9 + A11 marked RESOLVED in summary list; A41-A51 disposition section added.
- Completion report authored at
docs-site/docs/handoffs/powerfill-phase-6b-completion.md. - This devlog entry.
Decisions made
| # | Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| D1 | Monolithic verbatim conset port per ADR-021 | Decomposition + C# orchestration evaluated and rejected (parity risk + working-table lifetime concerns). PO-approved at checkpoint. |
| D2 | R-DATA-1 reconfigure (option 2) — but didn't need to apply | The conset Setup phase populates pfill_trade_base for small-balance instruments. PS_DemoData works as-shipped. |
| D3 | A1 revision via empirical NVO trace | Q4 Option A authorized the trace; result contradicts A1's "four discrete passes." PO-acknowledged at checkpoint. |
| D4 | 6b owns cblock tables (per A9 / A47) | cblock lifecycle is conset-internal; no external coordination needed. |
| D5 | SQL deploy file: 008_CreateAllocationProcedure.sql | Continues 001-007 sequence. |
| D6 | Constraint loop owner: T-SQL (proc-internal) | WHILE @xc<=@xcPop at NVO 571. C# does NOT iterate constraints. |
| D7 | C# extension self-implemented; SQL transcription delegated; tests self-implemented | Required Delegation Categories applied per cluster size + decision context. |
| D8 | 10-minute command timeout for conset EXEC | SqlClient default 30s insufficient; production scale could be longer. |
| D9 | SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER + SET ANSI_NULLS in SQL deploy preamble | Per A50: WITH ENCRYPTION procs capture SET options at CREATE time. |
Full decision context in the Phase 6b completion report §"Decisions made".
Findings (Primary-Source Verification Gate output — 9 findings across 3 layers)
| ID | Layer | Disposition |
|---|---|---|
| F-6b-1 | NVO-vs-doc | (a) Corrected in place — A46 |
| F-6b-2 | NVO-vs-doc | (a) Corrected in place — A1 revision |
| F-6b-3 | NVO-vs-implementation | (a) Corrected in place — A47 (A9 RESOLVED) |
| F-6b-4 | NVO-vs-implementation | (c) Deferred — A48 (Phase 9 optimization) |
| F-6b-5 | NVO-vs-tenant-DB | Self-resolved — conset Setup populates pfill_trade_base |
| F-6b-6 | NVO-vs-tenant-DB | (a) Already-corrected by pre-6b sweep |
| F-6b-7 | NVO-vs-tenant-DB | (a) Corrected in place — A50 (SET preamble in 008) |
| F-6b-8 | NVO-vs-tenant-DB | (c) Deferred — A49 (Phase 9 seed-schema audit) |
| F-6b-9 | NVO-vs-tenant-DB | (c) Deferred — A51 (parallel candidate-build observation) |
The three-layer Primary-Source Verification Gate produced findings at all three layers (this is now the second corroborating session for the candidate process refinement banked in the 2026-04-17b PoC-complete devlog). PO acknowledged at the checkpoint that the candidate refinement is now 3-session-corroborated and ready to advance from "banked" to "v3.1 nomination."
What's now true that wasn't this morning
POST /api/powerfill/runagainst PS_DemoData produces 515 real allocations in ~30s. The first economically-realistic PowerFill output PSSaaS has produced against real customer data.- Sample allocation rows have real loan IDs, real trade IDs, realistic loan amounts ($200K-$580K), realistic
prx_and_carryvalues (95-103). The legacy allocation engine works under PSSaaS. - A1 is canonical. The revised "3 stages per constraint" structure replaces Phase 0's invented "four discrete passes." A1.0 placeholder is RESOLVED.
- A9 is RESOLVED. "cblock" = "constraint capacity block." Conset-internal lifecycle.
- 6 new assumptions A46-A51 codify the 6b empirical findings (kickoff Truth Rot, cblock disposition,
@xc/@xcPopinefficiency, column-missing CREATE failure, SET options captured at CREATE time, parallel candidate-build observation). - R-DATA-1 is self-resolved — the conset proc has a more complete view of the data than 6a's C# candidate-builder. PS_DemoData works as-shipped without the planned reconfigure.
- Spec amended —
powerfill-engine.mdreflects the empirical multi-stage structure. - Phase 6b sentinel:
phase-6b-multi-pass-ready✓. - PSSaaS now has the canonical PowerFill deploy sequence:
001-008for any new tenant DB onboarding. Legacy auto-migrations covered (007); allocation engine deployed (008). - Tenant-onboarding artifact for Phase 6e is partially in place:
001-008is the canonical deploy + GRANT EXECUTE on dbo + the §3.4 PoC-data-state notes (carry curves seeded, constraints configured).
Process discipline observations (corroborating + new)
- Three-layer Primary-Source Verification Gate — second session corroborating the refinement. PO-acknowledged ready to advance to v3.1 nomination.
- Reviewable Chunks at sub-phase scope — first sub-phase to use a mid-flight PO checkpoint between planning and largest single delegation. Pattern paid off: Collaborator independently re-verified all 4 NVO citations during the pause; SQL transcription kicked off only after PO weighed in. Banked as a robust pattern: "stop after planning, before the largest single delegation."
- Subagent SQL transcription scales — 670 lines in 6a (006), 5,837 lines in 6b (008), both succeeded cleanly first attempt. Pattern: fast-subagent SQL transcription works at scale when the source is verbatim PB string-concat without complex unescape transformations.
- R-DATA-1 lesson — 6a's "data-state limitation" turned out to be a C# candidate-builder limitation, not a PowerFill global constraint issue. The conset proc has a more complete view. Future Architect sessions should be skeptical when 6a-time data observations claim the legacy proc would have the same gap.
- A50 lesson (SET options captured at CREATE time) — surfaced mid-execution, fixed at deploy time, but the discovery process was iterative (try caller-side, fail; try deploy-side, succeed). Worth banking for future PSSaaS proc deploys: all procs that touch indexed views / computed columns / filtered indexes need
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON; SET ANSI_NULLS ON;preamble in their*_*.sqldeploy file. - Legacy code from authors who anticipated archaeology is dramatically easier to port. The conset proc has 12 named CHECK POINT diagnostic markers + 4 stage labels left as scaffolding for exactly this kind of structural reading. Worth banking as a process observation for Phase 7+ planning: identify whether the legacy author left structural scaffolding, and if so, lean on it.
- Sub-phase calendar time was ~1 day vs the 7-10 day breakdown estimate. Reasons: empirical NVO trace was fast (~1 hour); Reviewable Chunks compressed scope; 6a infrastructure reusable; subagent transcription succeeded first try; discovered findings had clear in-place fixes. The breakdown's 7-10 day estimate may have been calibrated for a more decomposed approach (Option B); monolithic verbatim is significantly less work.
Files produced / modified
New:
src/backend/PowerSeller.SaaS.Modules.PowerFill/Sql/008_CreateAllocationProcedure.sql— verbatim conset port (5,919 lines)docs-site/docs/handoffs/powerfill-phase-6b-completion.md— completion reportdocs-site/docs/devlog/2026-04-18b-powerfill-phase-6b.md— this entry
Modified:
src/backend/PowerSeller.SaaS.Modules.PowerFill/Services/PowerFillRunService.cs— Step 4 + RunAllocationStepAsync (~80 LOC)src/backend/PowerSeller.SaaS.Modules.PowerFill/Contracts/RunContracts.cs— RunSummary 3 new fieldssrc/backend/PowerSeller.SaaS.Modules.PowerFill/PowerFillModule.cs— sentinel bumpsrc/backend/tests/PowerSeller.SaaS.Modules.PowerFill.Tests/Services/PowerFillRunServiceTests.cs— 4 new testsdocs-site/docs/specs/powerfill-engine.md— multi-stage allocation amendment + pseudo-code update + 3 Open Items RESOLVEDdocs-site/docs/specs/powerfill-assumptions-log.md— A1 revision + A1.0 RESOLVED + A46-A51 added + summary entries 1, 2, 16 RESOLVED + A41-A51 disposition section
Out of scope (deliberately not produced):
- No new C# entities (5 output tables already exist via
001). - No new HTTP endpoints (4th step folds into existing
POST /run). - No
pfill_pool_guidepopulation (6c). - No UE pass / synthetic trades (6d).
- No async / audit (6e).
Verification
# Build
docker exec pssaas-api dotnet build /app/PowerSeller.SaaS.sln --nologo
# → Build succeeded. 0 Warning(s), 0 Error(s).
# Tests
docker exec pssaas-api dotnet test /app/PowerSeller.SaaS.sln --nologo --no-build
# → BestEx: 32/0/0 Api: 1/0/0 PowerFill: 114/6/0
# → TOTAL: 147 passed, 6 skipped, 0 failed (added 4 new tests; no regressions)
# Sentinel (Deploy Verification Gate arm a)
curl -s "http://pssaas.powerseller.local/api/powerfill/status"
# → {"module":"PowerFill","status":"phase-6b-multi-pass-ready"}
# Live API run (Deploy Verification Gate arm b — THE MILESTONE)
curl -s --max-time 700 -X POST -H "X-Tenant-Id: ps-demodata" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
"http://pssaas.powerseller.local/api/powerfill/run" -d '{}'
# → status: Complete, duration ~29.7s, allocated_count: 515, all 4 steps Succeeded
# OBJECT_ID + allocation row count (Deploy Verification Gate arm c)
docker exec pssaas-db /opt/mssql-tools18/bin/sqlcmd \
-S "hostedps-sql..." -U "kevin_pssaas_dev" -P '...' -No -d PS_DemoData \
-Q "SELECT OBJECT_ID('dbo.psp_powerfill_conset'), COUNT(*) FROM dbo.pfill_powerfill_guide"
# → (proc present, 515 rows)
Full output captured in the Phase 6b completion report.
What's next
- Collaborator review of 008 (5,919-line port — review focus is structural-anchor verification + spot-checks); the C# extension; spec + assumption-log amendments; this devlog + completion report. Estimated 1.5-2 hours.
- PO push of the 4 atomic commits.
- Sub-phase 6c kickoff drafting —
psp_powerfill_pool_guideport (NVO 8770-11185 per A39 — the live range, not the dead 7194-8769). Reads from 6b'spfill_powerfill_guide; producespfill_pool_guide(BR-3 pool-action state machine: Remaining / Leaving / Joining / Switching / Swapped In). 6c can dispatch immediately; A1 (revised), A47, A48, A50 are the inputs. - (Optional, deferred) Seed-schema audit per A49 — add the missing columns / tables so local-dev
POST /runproduces allocations too. Phase 9 backlog item; not blocking 6c.
Cross-references
- Phase 6b Completion Report:
/handoffs/powerfill-phase-6b-completion - Pre-6b sweep arc:
/devlog/2026-04-18-pre-6b-sweep - Phase 6a PoC-complete arc:
/devlog/2026-04-17b-powerfill-phase-6a-poc-complete - Phase 6a morning Architect commits:
/devlog/2026-04-17-powerfill-phase-6a - A1-A51 in assumption log:
/specs/powerfill-assumptions-log - PowerFill spec:
/specs/powerfill-engine - New deploy script:
src/backend/PowerSeller.SaaS.Modules.PowerFill/Sql/008_CreateAllocationProcedure.sql
End of Phase 6b devlog. The next planned milestone is Phase 6c kickoff (pool-action derivation via psp_powerfill_pool_guide port). 6c can dispatch immediately — no PO-blocking prerequisites remain.